Why I ended my working relationship with Prince Miller—and what I discussed with Brian “Glaze” Gibbs about compensation, promises and the paperwork connection.
📂 Prince Miller (left) and Hannah Rahner (right) feature prominently in Elliott Carterr’s account of broken promises, shared paperwork and a professional relationship gone sour.
💥 From Behind The Scenes To Across The Table
Staten Island, NY - I’ve ended my working relationship with Gerald “Prince” Miller. In an interview with his longtime public adversary, Brian “Glaze” Gibbs, I explained how we reached that point.
I worked behind the scenes, invested my own money, and listened to repeated promises about what we would accomplish together.
But one detail needs to be clear: $200 was everything Prince paid me throughout our entire working relationship.
This is my firsthand account of a professional dispute I’m personally involved in. Where information came from someone else, I identify it accordingly.
🎙️ Brian “Glaze” Gibbs hosted Elliott Carterr’s interview detailing his split with Prince Miller and the $200 he says he received for all his work.
💵 Everything I Did. Just $200.
My work included editing, creating clips, developing podcast topics, researching, writing articles, managing social media, providing advisement and making introductions.
I also paid for travel to New York, a hotel and transportation home. Those expenses alone exceeded the $200 I received.
During one month of our collaboration, Prince’s YouTube channel made approximately $12,000, according to the revenue information he shared with me. In my interview with Glaze, I showed the receipt for Prince’s $200 payment.
That wasn’t one month’s pay. It was my total compensation for everything I did.
We hadn’t agreed on a specific payment amount or revenue percentage. But after the work, expenses and promises, that payment convinced me I needed an exit plan.
🤝🏾 Promises That Never Became Payment
Kenneth “Supreme” McGriff introduced me to Prince, initially so we could promote the petition I wrote supporting Supreme’s release.
Our relationship grew into content production and support for Prince’s platforms.
🕰️ Prince Miller (left) and his uncle Kenneth “Supreme” McGriff (right) in an archival photograph; Carterr says McGriff introduced him to Miller.
Prince repeatedly discussed future opportunities involving LL Cool J, Nas and Resorts World Casino as reasons for me to remain patient. Those were promises he communicated to me—not commitments I personally received from those artists or the business.
He even told my mother he would make me a millionaire.
In a later message, Prince said we would continue doing business but would “spell out everything moving forward.”
By then, I had decided to leave. I blocked him afterward.
📂 Hannah Rahner And The Paperwork Connection
I introduced Prince to Hannah Rahner. My understanding is that she attends law school at Syracuse University and works under a licensed attorney. She herself has not yet passed the bar and plans to take it soon.
Hannah supplied both Prince and me with requested case paperwork for our content about people we identified as cooperating with authorities. She was also the source of the documents I provided for this report.
Those requests included records concerning Jimmy “Henchman” Rosemond, Bimmy, Fat Cat and other people whose cases we discussed.
She also helped Prince obtain addresses and information to locate people and became involved in efforts concerning Supreme’s release.
In the interview, I raised concerns about restricted paperwork and personal boundaries between Hannah and Prince. The documents presented here do not independently establish improper access or disclosure, and some of the private interactions I discussed were described to me rather than witnessed by me.
📄 The Letter Targeting Glaze’s Videos
Among the documents Hannah supplied was a July 10, 2026, letter bearing her name and signature requesting that YouTube review videos associated with Glaze’s channel.
📝 Page one of the July 10, 2026, removal request alleges that videos circulated nonpublic court material identifying two private women and asks YouTube to intervene.
The letter argues that a nonpublic federal court document circulated online and exposed two private women’s identities in connection with sexual-assault allegations.
It requests removal or redaction of affected videos, consideration of broader enforcement, and preservation of electronic records.
This is the document I identified during our interview as connected to the action against Glaze’s YouTube presence. The supplied copy does not name Prince or establish YouTube’s eventual decision, and it bears a “COPY NOT FOR USE” watermark.
📞 A Police Call And A Public Break
During the interview, I also played a voicemail from a caller seeking my statement about an incident in Meriden.
Based on the surrounding communications, I understood that contact to concern my posts involving Prince and Hannah, and that Prince approved police involvement. The voicemail itself does not identify who made the complaint.
By the end of my conversation with Glaze, we discussed working together and recording another installment.
For me, the relationship with Prince ended because the work I contributed and the promises I received never translated into meaningful compensation.
The interview was my opportunity to explain that decision publicly.
Prince’s and Hannah’s responses are not included in this account.
Not for clicks — for clarity.
— Elliott Carterr, LFTG Radio
📱 TikTok: @e.carterr ↗
📸 Instagram: @si_breakingnews ↗
📺 YouTube: @lftgradio ↗
🌐 Website: LFTGRadio.com ↗
⚖️ The Gutter Justice Project ↗
❤️ Support the work ↗
